Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of Changes
As requested from the discord, this PR adds a flag which skips the "Are you sure you want to publish to a non-local server?".
Conversation context: https://discord.com/channels/1037340874172014652/1138987509834059867/1496964407278698656
API and ABI breaking changes
None - we would like this to eventually just be worked into the
--yesflag but there isn't a way to do that right now that doesn't break the API.Expected complexity level and risk
1 - This just adds a flag that skips a prompt.
Testing
spacetime publish --accept-remote <db-name>now skips only the prompt asking about publishing to a non-local server.