-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
desktops: move mesa/GPU runtime + diagnostics to common mid tier #885
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: armbian/configng
Length of output: 146
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: armbian/configng
Length of output: 2125
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: armbian/configng
Length of output: 1563
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: armbian/configng
Length of output: 2211
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: armbian/configng
Length of output: 1545
YAML comment's verification claim is broader than the commit message's stated scope.
The inline comment at lines 73–74 asserts these 9 packages were verified on Debian bookworm/trixie/forky/sid and Ubuntu jammy/noble/resolute across amd64/arm64/armhf/riscv64. However, the commit message states verification only covered:
This discrepancy matters because:
tier_overridesentries exist for any of the nine new packages to absorb per-release gaps.Either extend the Packages.gz verification to confirm the four unverified codenames (forky, sid, jammy, resolute) and keep the comment as-is, or narrow the comment to match what the commit message demonstrates was checked: trixie, noble, and bookworm-minus-riscv64.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CI is currently testing on several variants check once finished https://github.com/armbian/configng/actions/runs/24737304638
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
Let me check the CI run status.
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 35845
@igorpecovnik, the run is still in progress (~29 minutes in, 206 jobs total). Here's the current snapshot:Completed & passing ✅
enlightenment/GNOME/i3-wm/Cinnamon/Mateon noble, trixie, resolute, bookworm (amd64 + some arm64) — all green.Still running / queued ⏳
No failures so far — which is a good early signal. I'll keep the review comment open until the emulated armhf/riscv64 jobs finish, since those are the arches most relevant to the verification gap I flagged. Feel free to ping me once the run completes and I'll re-check and resolve if everything passes.
🧠 Learnings used