CI - Use new internal test inputs (#4231)

# Description of Changes

Flipping on some new inputs to `Internal Tests` to get new
functionality.

I'll follow-up with a more detailed description in discord.

# API and ABI breaking changes

None. CI only.

# Expected complexity level and risk

2

# Testing
- [x] public PR without private PR just uses master
- [x] public PR with private PR uses that one
  - [x] fails if private PR is not approved
  - [x] fails if private PR does not pass its CI
  - [x] passes if private PR is ready to go

---------

Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>

Author: bfops

.github/workflows/ci.yml

@@ -887,15 +887,16 @@ jobs:
             const targetRepo = process.env.TARGET_REPO;
             // Use the ref for pull requests because the head sha is brittle (github does some extra dance where it merges in master).
             const publicRef = (context.eventName === 'pull_request') ? context.payload.pull_request.head.ref : context.sha;
+            const publicPrNumber = context.payload.pull_request?.number ?? context.payload.inputs?.pr_number;
             const preDispatch = new Date().toISOString();
-  
+
             // Dispatch the workflow in the target repository
             await github.rest.actions.createWorkflowDispatch({
               owner: targetOwner,
               repo: targetRepo,
               workflow_id: workflowId,
               ref: targetRef,
-              inputs: { public_ref: publicRef }
+              inputs: { public_ref: publicRef, public_pr_number: String(publicPrNumber) }
             });
   
             const sleep = (ms) => new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, ms));